Automotive tipping point?
CW Editor Jeff Sloan predicts a tipping point for autocomposites after attending this year’s Society of Plastics Engineers’ Automotive Composites Conference and Exhibition (SPE ACCE).
#sheetmoldingcompound #aeroengines #audi
It’s early September as I write this and I am at the Society of Plastics Engineers’ Automotive Composites Conference and Exhibition (SPE ACCE) in the Detroit suburb of Novi, MI, US. If you are involved in autocomposites manufacturing, this is a must-attend event, drawing material and equipment suppliers, designers, fabricators, tier suppliers and OEMs from throughout the global automotive supply chain.
I have attended SPE ACCE almost every year since I became editor of CW in 2006. I have seen it weather seriously lean times during the 2009-2011 Great Recession, and I have seen it thrive since. I have listened each year to presentations about resins, fibers, manufacturing processes and software solutions aimed at making composites viable for high-volume automotive manufacturing. I have also heard automotive OEMs declaim what we’ve all heard are the serious disadvantages of composites: they are too expensive, too slow, too difficult to design, too difficult to model, too different.
For many years, it seemed composites might be perpetually relegated to high-end, high-priced, low-volume vehicles, destined to be purchased by the relatively few owners who could afford these “exotic materials.” The composites industry, of course, was not blind or deaf to the criticism leveled at it by automotive OEMs. In response, material and equipment suppliers and fabricators have worked diligently to develop technologies that reduce cost and cycle time. Advanced CAD and CAE programs, snap-cure resins, multimaterial adhesives, low-density SMC, and many other innovations leap to mind.
As a result, three or four years ago, we started seeing evidence of composites migrating into mid-priced, mid-volume vehicles from automakers like BMW and Audi. High-volume vehicles? Gosh, we were told, those same hurdles still loomed — price, cycle time, design inefficiency.
This year, walking the exhibit floor, listening to keynote speakers and taking in technical presentations, I have seen some remarkable things. Take, for instance, this morning’s keynote speaker, Mark Voss, engineering group manager at General Motors Co. He described in great detail the six-year development of the carbon fiber/nylon SMC pickup truck bed for the 2019 GMC Sierra Denali. He described the persistent, creative effort GM and its partners put into development of this first-of-its-kind, highly durable, versatile, tough bed that weighs 62 lb less than its steel predecessor.
Or, consider the Ford Motor Co. front-end module demonstrator on display in the Ashland booth. Covered in the August 2018 issue of CW, this structure, made by Magna International in cooperation with Ford, was fabricated with co-molded NCF and SMC, and consolidated 45 parts in the 27.4-kg steel version to just six parts in the composite version. It also reduced weight 34% and, over its life, is a more cost-effective, sustainable alternative. The truth is that you can’t walk more than a few feet at this conference and not discover a composite part or structure that proves not just the viability of composites in high-volume automotive, but their sensibility and affordability.
Frankly, any automotive OEM looking to reduce vehicle weight by converting major structures to composites has no shortage of options to do that efficiently. There are just too many fiber, resin and equipment options available to claim that it’s not possible. On top of that, the composites industry is replete with subject matter experts who have demonstrated repeatedly that they are more than willing and able to help automakers apply composites successfully. Of course, this is a not a one-way street: The willingness composites professionals possess must be matched by the willingness of carmakers.
This said, I do not mean to imply that all of the woes of autocomposites have been banished. Challenges remain, but if there is an autocomposites tipping point, this might be it.
Yes, composites are complex and atypical and occasionally confounding, and they are not the best material for all vehicle applications. But they are a great option for many vehicle applications, and they are easier to apply today than ever before.
Am I right? Time will tell, and in the meantime, we will continue to help make sure you are up to speed on the always-interesting autocomposites journey.
Approaching rollout and first flight, the 787 relies on innovations in composite materials and processes to hit its targets
The matrix binds the fiber reinforcement, gives the composite component its shape and determines its surface quality. A composite matrix may be a polymer, ceramic, metal or carbon. Here’s a guide to selection.
Spirit AeroSystems actualizes Airbus’ intelligent design for the A350’s center fuselage and front wing spar in Kinston, N.C.