Would you like a free digital subscription?

Qualified international subscribers can receive full issues of High-Performance Composites and Composites Technology delivered in a convenient and interactive digital magazine format. Read at your convenience on your desktop or mobile device.

Yes, I would like a free digital subscription!

No thanks, please don't ask again.

March 2004
Addressing the cost of aerospace composites

In the aerospace composites industry’s history, millions of research and development (R&D) dollars have been spent addressing cost.

Author:
Posted on: 1/26/2011
High-Performance Composites

Click Image to Enlarge

Carrol Grant mug shot

Carroll Grant is an independent contractor providing marketing and automated process consulting services to the aerospace composites industry. For more information, please contact him at (801) 495-1819 or cggrant@xmission.com.

In the aerospace composites industry’s history, millions of research and development (R&D) dollars have been spent addressing cost. As an industry, we have struggled with the cost issue for many years, yet still have managed a good growth rate. We can only speculate about how much greater industry growth might have been without the persistent cost struggle.

The cost drivers are not a great mystery. Our materials are very expensive, and to a great extent, we still rely on inefficient manufacturing processes. While we’re making progress with regard to material costs, aerospace-grade prepregs are still far more expensive than materials used by our metals competitors. With regard to processing efficiency, we have a lot of room for improvement.

More efficient manufacturing processes can help offset the cost of expensive aerospace-grade prepreg materials and make composites much more cost-competitive with metal aircraft structures. Although some very efficient automated processing methods are available to the industry, not enough fabricators are using them. Companies like Cincinnati Machine, Ingersoll, and ATK have done a great job of developing and maturing the automated tape layer (ATL) and fiber placement (FP) processes. These two processes are very efficient laminating technologies, and they are the closest comparison the composites industry has to metals machining equipment. ATL and FP could actually be characterized as “reverse machining.”

In the metal aircraft parts industry, small- and mid-sized shops normally canafford the latest automated processing technologies. These smaller suppliers are very much in demand by military aircraft programs. Most aircraft prime contractors engaged in military programs actually prefer “small suppliers” for their machined metal parts. In contrast, only the largest aerospace composites manufacturers can afford the most efficient automated processes. The smaller shops normally rely on lower-tech processing methods like hand layup. This must change if we are ever going to see a global improvement in the cost of aerospace composite parts.

Historically, most composites R&D programs have focused on reducing the cost of a specific aerospace composite part, which usually benefits only a specific aircraft program. If we could focus some composites R&D programs on the development of a new generation of more “affordable” composites machine tools, the benefits would be global. Smaller composite shops could more easily afford efficient automated laminating methods and would therefore be in higher demand as suppliers to both military and commercial aircraft programs. Military aircraft programs could rely more heavily on “small suppliers” for their composite parts, just as they do for metal parts.

During the past few years, I have marketed tape layers and fiber placement systems in North America and Europe. While pursuing this work, I’ve met with a large cross-section of composites parts manufacturers. In my conversations with these companies, there has been a consistent message about what composites part suppliers really want in processing equipment … a combination of “affordability” and “capability.” Most composites companies, regardless of size, are interested in improving their processing capabilities. But the investment required for current advanced automated laminating systems is a huge barrier to the smaller shops. The small- and mid-sized suppliers are effectively shut out from the most efficient automated processing methods until equipment becomes more affordable.

Eventually, a new generation (or “next” generation) of ATL and FP machines will be developed.  If the machine tool companies received  R&D funding from sources like NIST’s Advanced Technology Program (ATP), it would certainly help expedite development of these machines. The next generation of machines should be developed in a wider variety of sizes and configurations — and they must be more affordable to a broader spectrum of composites parts suppliers. When the machine tool companies develop this next generation of machines, they will open up a huge new market for advanced composites processing systems and give small- and mid-sized composites manufacturers the tools they need to compete with metal on a more level playing field.

Comments are reviewed by moderators before they appear to ensure they meet CompositeWorld’s submission guidelines.
comments powered by Disqus

Maximise your effectiveness in machining composites with leading cutting tool solutions
AFP/ATL Software Knowledge Center

Channel Partners