| 1 MINUTE READ

RVB Infusion = Light RTM?

There is some difference of opinion as to whether parts infused under reusable vacuum bags (RVBs) are the equivalent of those produced by Light resin transfer molding (RTM). See why.
#layup #outofautoclave #autoclave

Share

Facebook Share Icon LinkedIn Share Icon Twitter Share Icon Share by EMail icon Print Icon

There is some difference of opinion as to whether parts infused under reusable vacuum bags (RVBs) are the equivalent of those produced by Light resin transfer molding (RTM). Arlington Heights, Ill.-based Composites One’s RVB expert Ashley Duncan says no. Like Light RTM, RVB infusion eliminates styrene emissions and reduces cycle time, but a sprayed RVB alone typically does not provide an engineered B-side finish: “If you need a gel coat finish on the B-side,” she says, “then a semirigid or rigid countermold is the solution.”

But Torr Technologies’ (Auburn, Wash.) president Greg Lindstrom asserts that in his experience autoclave-worthy silicone sheet goods can be processed to provide a cosmetic B-side, up to and including a Class A finish.

Rich Rydin of RVB system provider SR Composites LLC (Henderson, Nev.), however, has advocated for several years the use of a “floating caul plate” under the flexible membrane to achieve two-sided cosmetic parts as an alternative to Light RTM. Alan Harper (Alan Harper Composites Ltd. (Saltash, Cornwall, U.K.) adds that an RVB’s very high elongation and flexibility allows for variation in layup schedules, permits higher reinforcement loading than Light RTM and costs less than a rigid B-side mold.

RELATED CONTENT

  • The evolution of infusion

    As resin infusion continues to infiltrate composites, fabricators across the market spectrum drive materials and process developments in pursuit of process control.

  • JEC World 2016, the full report

    CompositesWorld's editors report on the technologies and products that caught our eye at JEC World 2016, in early March.

  • Thermosets vs. thermoplastics: Is the battle over?

    Dale Brosius, the chief commercialization officer for the Institute for Advanced Composites Manufacturing Innovation (IACMI) and a regular CW columnist, sees a shift in the industry from infighting between proponents of thermoset and thermoplastic composites to a healthier competitive atmosphere that serves to make composites overall more competitive with legacy materials.