Musings about heat shields

NASA’s Orion capsule employs an ablative material based on the same heat shield coating used for the Apollo missions.


Facebook Share Icon LinkedIn Share Icon Twitter Share Icon Share by EMail icon Print Icon

While driving to SPE’s Automotive Composites Conference & Exhibition (ACCE) in Novi, MI, US, I stopped in Wapakoneta, OH to visit the Armstrong Air & Space Museum, as one does. During the drive I had been contemplating heat shield composition of various crew modules because just last week Lockheed Martin (Denver, CO, US) announced it had completed construction on the capsule structure for NASA's Orion Exploration Mission-2 (EM-2) spacecraft and shipped it to Kennedy Space Center in Florida for final assembly.

I knew I’d be traveling by the Armstrong Museum and wanted to stop because some of the technology used for the Apollo capsule was revisited for Orion – specifically Avcoat, an epoxy novolac resin with silica fibers in a fiberglass-phenolic honeycomb matrix. I was hoping there might be a capsule on display, but had to settle for a mockup. There was a Gemini crew module. Similarly, Gemini’s heat shield was made from a paste-like silicone elastomer material which was poured into a fiberglass honeycomb form. 

While the Avcoat that is being applied to Orion is pretty much the same material that was applied to Apollo, the method of adhering the material to the craft itself for this mission has changed a bit. Traditionally a fiberglass honeycomb is bonded to the primary structure and the paste-like material is gunned into each cell individually. For the latest Orion capsule, Avcoat blocks are fabricated separately and then bonded to the heat shield base, which is constructed of a titanium truss covered with a carbon fiber composite substrate.

Still, it’s pretty cool to think that Orion has more in common with Apollo than just a similar look; and it’s amazing that a material developed decades ago is still in use today.


  • Wet compression molding

    Automated process cuts cycle time and cost for CFRP parts with potential for 65% fiber volume via Dynamic Fluid Compression Molding variant.

  • Structural adhesives, Part I: Industrial

    Today’s myriad chemistry options enable formulators to tailor adhesives to customers' exact application requirements.

  • The matrix

    The matrix binds the fiber reinforcement, gives the composite component its shape and determines its surface quality. A composite matrix may be a polymer, ceramic, metal or carbon. Here’s a guide to selection.