A400M cargo door: Out of the autoclave
Airlift capability and supply portability are key elements in any country’s military and emergency preparedness. Until now, Boeing’s C-17 Globemaster and Lockheed Martin’s C-130J Hercules, introduced decades ago, have made up the bulk of the world’s roughly 2,300 aging military transports, and many are due for refurbishment. Airbus Military (Blagnac, France) hopes to capture a chunk of this strategic market with its new A400M cargo plane.
The new airlifter, slightly larger than the C-130J but smaller than the C-17, is composites-intensive — the design and manufacture of the A400M’s composite wing spars, which will support the world’s largest turboprop aircraft engines, were described in a previous issue of HPC (see “Editor's Picks,” at left). The aircraft’s vertical and horizontal tailplane, produced in Spain, is also a large carbon fiber/epoxy component.
In January of this year, the first A400M upper cargo door — the largest structural composite aircraft component produced to date using the vacuum-assisted resin infusion process — was delivered by the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Co. (EADS) Military Air Systems Business Unit (Augsburg, Germany) to Airbus for the first fuselage assembly. EADS Augsburg is the largest external supplier for the Airbus family and through its Center of Competence has helped de-sign and promote innovative materials and technologies for aerostructures. One of the cargo doors was recently on display at the JEC Composites Show in Paris, France. The door represents a significant breakthrough for low-cost, out-of-autoclave processing in a highly demanding structural application.
Design for lower cost
The A400M, with its four turboprop engines and high wing, is designed with cargo doors that open at the rear of the fuselage. The 7m/23-ft long by 4m/13-ft wide all-composite upper cargo door, described in this article, swings upward and inward while a lower cargo door, equipped with a metal ramp, simultaneously rotates outward and down to allow vehicles and cargo to be loaded or unloaded. When closed, the two doors form the smooth rear fuselage underbelly.
The geometrically complex upper door was designed for the lowest possible weight, says an EADS Augsburg design engineer, to reduce loads on the door mechanism and to help meet the overall A400M weight target. Less weight in the airframe means larger payloads can be hauled. In addition, part stiffness had to be maximized because the door is located within the pressurized portion of the fuselage, subject to significant fatigue loading during pressurization cycles.
EADS engineers used finite element analysis (FEA) software to design the door for the anticipated loads. They also opted to forego the autoclave and make the door using EADS’ patented infusion technology, dubbed VAP (vacuum-assisted process), to minimize production costs. As do many other infusion processes now in use within the composites industry, VAP employs a vacuum to facilitate epoxy resin infusion of dry carbon fiber reinforcements under a vacuum bag. The part then is cured in an oven rather than in an autoclave process.
The door comprises several elements. The largest, the outer skin, is a slightly domed and tapered rectangle made of a solid, uncored carbon/epoxy laminate. The skin’s inner surface is stiffened with 16 stringers oriented parallel to the fuselage’s long axis. A separate edge wall, roughly 203 mm/8 inches high, forms the perimeter of the part. Nine beefy crossbeams run perpendicular to the stringers and are attached to the skins with metallic fasteners. A narrow inner skin (see Steps 1 & 7, at right) covers the central portion of the door’s inside surface and functions as a partial inner for additional rigidity. It is also stiffened with several small stringers. A metal hinge bolted to the outer skin attaches the door to the fuselage, and large metal hooks affixed to the edge wall are used to hold the door in place during flight.
A key element of the design and VAP process is the fact that the stiffening stringers are integral and cocured with the door’s outer and inner skins, saving considerable production time and eliminating thousands of fasteners. The design team was able to dispense with roughly 3,000 metallic rivets that would have been required to attach the stringers to the outer skin, saving fastener weight and also considerable cost.
No autoclave needed
Door fabrication begins with layup of the outer skin on a female carbon fiber/epoxy composite tool, designed and made in-house by EADS. While the company does not discuss the exact number and orientation of skin plies, a combination of dry carbon fiber multiaxial reinforcements supplied by SAERTEX (Saerbeck, Germany) in 0/90° and ±45° styles, as well as dry uniaxial fabric supplied by Hexcel (Dublin, Calif.), make up the laminate. The innermost ply (see Step 3) has additional buildups in the areas that will be contacted by stringers and crossbeams.
Augsburg engineers refer to the integral stiffening stringers as an “L-Z” design, essentially shaped like the capital letter Z with a vertical web, superimposed over a backward-facing capital letter L. Stringers are about 65 mm/2.5 inches high with a 50-mm/2-inch wide lower flange. Multiple plies in the top flange of the stringer drop off to about half the number in the vertical web; the web plies then split to form the horizontal lower flange. A combination of the SAERTEX 0/90° and ±45° multiaxial dry reinforcements and the unidirectional material from Hexcel make up the stringers. To hold the dry stringer reinforcements in place during preforming, Augsburg reports that some of the reinforcements are supplied with a thermoplastic polyamide veil or tissue on the top surface; when heated, the thermoplastic veil melts and becomes tacky, thus holding the multiple plies together.
Technicians preform the stringers on an inexpensive wooden template by stacking the multiaxial strips and then heating them with a small heat gun to melt the thermoplastic and thus bond the plies together. Short ply buildups on the top flange are made with the unidirectional material; the 0/90° and ±45° material forms the continuous plies through the web. A triangular “noodle” or filler made with small-diameter carbon fiber braid is inserted into the void formed where the plies split to create the flat lower flange.
The preformed stringers are then placed on the layed up skin, over the buildups. Long, carbon fiber/epoxy mandrels are placed on both sides of each stringer to hold the preforms in the correct shape and to provide consolidation pressure during cure. Then, each stringer and its mandrels are covered with GORE-TEX gas-permeable membrane material supplied by W.L. Gore & Assoc. (Newark, Del.).
When all the stringers are in place and bagged, technicians then bag the entire door — the outer skin part and the stringers — with standard breather material and bagging film and prepare for the infusion. The resin is RTM-6 one-part epoxy, manufactured by Hexcel. This well-known infusion resin was reportedly easy to process, offering good hot/wet performance to 180°C/350°F, and it has a processing window of more than two hours — enough time to infuse a part of this size.
When the VAP process is initiated and a vacuum is pulled on the outer bag, the GORE-TEX allows air evacuation from each of the stringer bags. As resin is introduced, using vacuum pressure only, into each of the stringers as well as the skin, the GORE-TEX ensures that resin stays within each stringer bag for complete infusion. The company claims the special membrane makes the cocuring concept work. “The GORE-TEX allows air but not the resin to pass through, so we can ensure complete air evacuation and resin infusion of each stringer, maximizing final fiber content and minimizing voids,” says one engineer.
The outer skin/stringer part is then placed in an oven for several hours at 180°C/350°F to cure. No postcure is required.
The door’s narrow inner skin is made in the same manner, using the same procedure to cocure its integral stringers. The remaining components are also made using VAP. The endwall incorporates sections of Rohacell PMI (polymethacrylimide) foam core supplied by Rohm Degussa GmbH (Darmstadt, Germany). The core is placed in the areas between crossbeam fastener locations, for less part weight.
The crossbeams are thick, solid laminates with a series of cutouts along their lower edge to accommodate the stringers. The beams also are made with spread flanges along their lower edges to facilitate through-bolting to the outer skin (see Step 8, at right).
Assembly of the complete cargo door involves a large holding jig (see Step 9, at right), which supports the outer skin and enables assembly, bonding, drilling and fastening of all of the door’s components and attachment of the hinge parts. After assembly is complete, the doors are painted and delivered to Airbus in Bremen, Germany. There, as HPC went to press, three fuselages had been assembled, one of which will undergo static and dynamic testing to failure, according to Airbus.
Augsburg engineers note that, when in full production, at least three doors per month will have to be produced at the Augsburg facility. While hand-preforming methods sufficed for the initial articles, the company has contracted with a German company to produce a machine intended to automate the stringer preforming process, which will help make the infused part more cost-effective.
The first flight of the A400M is scheduled for January 2008. With more than 190 firm orders, Airbus is keen to meet its published schedule and begin deliveries of the plane to customers in the fall of 2009. A lot is riding on the success of the A400M — a new entry with the potential to rejuvenate the strategic airlift market.
The matrix binds the fiber reinforcement, gives the composite component its shape and determines its surface quality. A composite matrix may be a polymer, ceramic, metal or carbon. Here’s a guide to selection.
As next-generation aerospace programs demand higher service temperatures in structural and hot section components, a variety of polyimides vie for program approval.
Yes, advanced forms are in development, but has the technology progressed enough to make the business case?