Farnborough Airshow Report 2006

The biggest and busiest in recent memory, this year's event puts an unprecedented spotlight on composites.
#787 #a350 #a380


Facebook Share Icon LinkedIn Share Icon Twitter Share Icon Share by EMail icon Print Icon

The Farnborough International Airshow, held July 13-23 in Farn- borough, U.K., was one of the biggest in recent memory, with major new product and program launches. The show's 1,480 exhibitors from 35 countries conducted more than $42 billion (USD) of business.

Show visitors included British Prime Minister Tony Blair and some 75 defense delegations and 40 civil aerospace contingents from a total of 58 countries. Attendance figures exceeded 133,000.

Although Airbus Industrie's (Toulouse, France) new A380 passenger jet continued to impress media and visitors alike with its size - on the ground and in the air - it was the aircraft manufacturer's mid-size, twin-aisle A350 that attracted the greatest attention. There was much preshow speculation about what Airbus officials might announce in regard to its troubled program and the related management upheavals at Airbus and parent company EADS. Airbus did not disappoint. Its new CEO, Christian Streiff, made a very good impression as a man who understands the need to restore the customer's confidence in Airbus. In particular, he was not going to be rushed into fully launching the new version A350 until he was sure it was the right aircraft - a decision for a formal industrial launch is anticipated in October. What he did promise is that it will be "Best in Class"when the design is complete. Airbus claims that the renamed A350 XWB (Xtra-Wide Body) equals or betters the 787 Dreamliner from arch-rival The Boeing Co. (Seattle, Wash.) in all important performance areas. The A350 XWB's all-composite wing design increases the sweep of the original A350's wing by 3°, from 30° to 33°, enabling the plane's cruise speed to be increased to Mach 0.85. Airbus VP of programs Tom Williams emphasized that the delay had the benefit of allowing Airbus to look at alternative materials and processes since the decision to use prepreg was being reevaluated for some wing parts.

Airbus talked about increasing composites use in the fuselage but would not elaborate. However, the company did reveal that the XWB's fuselage diameter will be 300 mm/12 inches greater than on the earlier design - about 100 mm/4 inches wider than the 787 at passenger shoulder height. Additionally, passenger cabin comfort will be increased, with a pressure equivalent to an altitude of 2,000m/6,000 ft, 20 percent humidity and the widest windows ever on a modern aircraft. Airbus also claimed a small but significant 2 to 7 percent improvement in operating cost, compared with the 787. Most impressive, however, were comparisons with the previous-generation Boeing 777: both the 350 XWB and 787 are expected to reduce per-seat fuel consumption by 26 to 30 percent.

Boeing, meanwhile, displayed quiet confidence in its 787 program, reporting that the plane's first wing was being assembled. Previous reports of a poor-quality fuselage barrel test specimen were dismissed as a normal development event, caused by a new composite mandrel that leaked under vacuum in just one of the nine barrels made for the test program. Boeing says the program will not be delayed because testing will be split to allow fabrication of a replacement mandrel, using an alter-native resin system. Although the popular media tried to make a big issue of this "failure,"this composites engineer found Boeing's explanation very plausible - in fact, rather familiar. Of more interest to the better-informed trade press was Boeing 787 program general manager Mike Bair's statement that the company intends to increase composites use on the 787 from 50 to 51 or 52 percent. In particular, he believed they now can make cost-effective carbon fiber ribs. It had previously been difficult to replace metal ribs with composites because the latter required a much larger radius in the right-angle bend on the attachment flange. (Composites do not take loads as effectively as metals around sharp bends.) The result had been a wider, heavier flange that placed rivets further from the bend, increasing the loads.