Would you like a free digital subscription?

Qualified international subscribers can receive full issues of High-Performance Composites and Composites Technology delivered in a convenient and interactive digital magazine format. Read at your convenience on your desktop or mobile device.

Yes, I would like a free digital subscription!

No thanks, please don't ask again.

October 2010
Composites tap tide energy

Composites-enabled tidal stream energy projects lead the way as new forms of hydrokinetic power generation move toward commercialization.

Author:
Posted on: 9/30/2010
Source: Composites Technology

Click Image to Enlarge

MCT Tidal Turbine

Designed to work as an “underwater wind turbine,” the SeaGen tidal energy system built by Marine Current Turbines Ltd. (Bristol, U.K.) converts tidal energy to electricity with the aid of four 8m/26-ft carbon- and glass-reinforced composite blades on pitch-controlled axial-flow rotors. When submerged (see photo below), the blades are flooded with water to equalize internal/external pressure. Source: Marine Current Turbines Ltd.

MCT Turbine submerged

An artist's conception of the SeaGen turbine, with blades submerged. Source: Marine Current Turbines Ltd.

ORPC Turbine

This beta version of a Turbine Generating Unit (TGU) tidal system, developed by Portland, Maine-based Ocean Renewable Power Co. and deployed in Cobscook Bay off the coast of nearby Eastport, was suspended from a moored barge called the Energy Tide 2. Commercial TGU systems will not require a barge. Instead, they will be self-buoyant or attached to gravity-based foundations. Source: Ocean Renewable Power Co.

ORPC Turbine (closeup)

The TGU incorporates a carbon/E-glass hybrid primary shaft, and disks, rings, and helical foils constructed of E-glass-reinforced vinyl ester laminate. Source: Ocean Renewable Power Co.

Pulse Tidal Hydrofoils

In the Pulse Tidal (Sheffield, U.K.) system, oscillating composite hydrofoils, which will be engineered and produced by Gurit (Isle of Wight, U.K.), are moved up and down by the tidal stream to drive a generator. The hydrofoils’ horizontal orientation permits deployment in shallow water and places no inherent limits on blade length. Source: Pulse Tidal

Deep Green

In the Deep Green tidal system, tethered “kites” will stabilize horizontal-axis turbines at desired depth within a tidal stream. The system, which is still in the early development phase at prospective tidal-energy firm Minesto AB (Göteborg, Sweden and London, U.K.), will incorporate composite components now in progress at Marstrom Composites (Västervik, Sweden). Source: Minesto AB

Hydrokinetic power is not new: Turbines beneath hydroelectric dams on many of the world’s rivers began delivering electric power to national grids early in the last century. But in the next 20 years, hydrokinetic power drawn from the earth’s oceans and rivers by other means could account for more than 10 percent of the world’s global electricity market. Harnessed from ocean wave, tidal stream, ocean and river current and ocean thermal resources, these new renewable energy resources are poised for major growth over the next five years. In fact, more than 300 hydrokinetic projects are currently underway around the world, according to Pike Research (Boulder, Colo.), which points to Canada, the U.K. and the U.S. as the likely leaders in widespread commercialization.

Most promising are projects that exploit the energy in ocean tides and waves. “The outlook for wave and tidal energy, particularly in the U.K., is very promising,” says Marcus Royle, head of Strategic Business Development at composite materials supplier Gurit (Isle of Wight, U.K.). “The last 12 to 24 months have seen the industry move forward in great leaps with the deployment of a number of devices at significant scale and with engineering underway for several more commercial-scale projects,” he says, noting the “growing investment interest from large multinational industrial organizations.”

There are several hotbeds of tidal and wave energy development in the world, with more on the horizon. Established test-bed sites include the European Marine Energy Centre (EMEC) in Scotland’s Orkney Islands; the New and Renewable Energy Centre (NaREC) in England; the Fundy Ocean Research Centre for Energy (FORCE) site in the Bay of Fundy (Nova Scotia, Canada); Galway Bay in Ireland, and Nissum Bredning in Denmark.

This activity is well in line with the U.K. government’s recently released Offshore Valuation report, says Royle, which predicts that wave and tidal energy will contribute up to 51 gigawatts (GW) of capacity to the U.K. electrical grid over the next 40 years. “You can see that we have significant technology and manufacturing industries within our reach,” he adds.

Globally, installed capacity of hydrokinetic energy is predicted to reach 3.8 GW by 2015, says Global Industry Analysts Inc. (San Jose, Calif.), which has published a market report on ocean energy. In a similar study, Pike Research contends that if ocean energy trial projects are successful in the next few years, commercial ocean-energy production worldwide could take an enormous jump to 200 GW of installed power generation capacity as  early as 2025.

“The ocean energy business is right on the cusp,” contends Pike’s managing director Clint Wheelock, explaining that it is “still in a proof-of-concept phase for several key technologies, and the outcome of early pilot projects will determine whether wave energy, tidal energy and other technologies are ready for primetime.” But Pike’s report also warns that “if early projects have limited success, are too costly or do not enjoy a favorable public policy regime, the marine renewable sector could be relegated to niche status, reaching no more than 25 GW in global capacity by 2025.”

Material selection will play a critical role in success (or lack of same), and composites — time-tested in both marine and wind applications — are a natural fit for harsh, corrosive salt water environments.

“Virtually all of the wave and tidal generation concepts currently active can, or do, utilize composites in some form due to corrosion-resistance, fatigue-life and durability requirements,” confirms Gurit’s Royle, whose company has supplied not only materials technology but also structural-engineering and device-prototyping services to ocean-energy companies for several years. 

Of the vast array of competing hydrokinetic energy-capture concepts, however, only a handful, to date, have proven themselves on a commercial scale. On that front, tidal energy is leading the way to commercial hydrokinetic energy, with wave-energy development following close behind (see the “Wave energy conversion” sidebar below or click on its title uner "Editor's Picks," at right). There are a wide range of tidal projects underway, with a variety of underlying technologies at play, including axial flow turbine systems (both horizontal and vertical axis), cross-flow turbines and oscillating hydrofoil systems — each making use of composites.



Predictable energy from earth’s tides

The rise and fall of Earth’s sea level creates a power source that is predictable in both timing and force, allowing energy utilities to accurately forecast the amount of power that will be generated by a tidal device at any given time. Notably, the same cannot be done for wind turbines. Composites are particularly well suited, therefore, to tidal energy, says Royle, where “low weight is a bigger driver and the loads experienced are more predictable and allow the use of a more refined structural design.”

Predictability, however, does not eliminate the challenges associated with submerging energy-generating devices into attractively strong tidal streams. The Bay of Fundy, for example, produces huge tidal currents, pushing more than 100 billion tons of water out of the bay with each tide. According to tidal energy producer Marine Current Turbines (MCT, Bristol, U.K.), when the tide flows through the 6-km/3.7-mile wide narrows between Cape Split and Parrsboro, Nova Scotia, it moves at speeds of up to 14 kmh/8.7 mph.

Given the significant forces involved, tidal turbines must be engineered to stringent standards, the parameters of which concept developers are still discovering. OpenHydro (Dublin, Ireland), for example, recently suffered a setback in the bay when two of the glass-fiber reinforced composite blades in one of its open-center turbine tidal systems broke. The company and its partner in the Bay of Fundy project, Nova Scotia Power, plan to remove the damaged turbine this fall, repair it and then redeploy it in 2011.

Rated at 1 megawatt (MW), the commercial scale turbine was stationed at the FORCE deployment site in Nova Scotia. OpenHydro has conducted extensive testing of its turbine design at the EMEC in Scotland, where it was the first to install a tidal turbine and subsequently connect and generate electricity for the U.K. national power grid, according to the company.

Its horizontal-axis turbine design employs glass-reinforced composite blades and a self-contained rotor with a solid-state permanent magnet generator encapsulated within the outer rim.

The turbine is housed within a ductwork, creating a Venturi effect to concentrate the flow of water and produce a pressure differential. In lieu of a central axle, a stator is used to keep the rotors fixed. Combined, the turbine and gravity base, which holds the device on the seabed, measure 16m/52.5 ft wide. Its blades measure approximately 1m/3.3 ft wide.

Reportedly, OpenHydro is testing an array that will anchor three smaller turbines on a triangular frame off of the seabed.


     
Learning from wind power

Horizontal-axis underwater turbines, such as OpenHydro’s open-center turbine and MCT’s SeaGen, operate in much the same way a wind turbine does. Wind power system design, therefore, provides a good working model for a tidal turbine system. However, water is, at sea level, nearly 800 times more dense than air. Although this creates immensely strong tidal currents that offer the potential for significantly greater energy output than that of a similarly sized offshore wind turbine system, the dense water also magnifies the shear, bending and torque loads faced by tidal blades. And, unlike wind turbines, tidal rotors do not exhibit centrifugal release, the result when centrifugal force relieves blade bending stress. Therefore, submerged turbine blade designs feature some important differences.

According to MCT, the SeaGen tidal turbines “work much like submerged windmills.” Each system employs two 16m/52.5-ft diameter pitch-controlled axial-flow rotors similar to those used in the wind industry. Composite blades are attached to metal rotor hubs and shafts that sit on either end of a composite-and-steel cross-arm (see photo, at right). Suspended on a piling that is embedded in the seafloor, the cross-arm and rotors can be raised out of the water for maintenance. Like many wind systems, tidal turbine rotor blades also can be pitched to limit the power to a preselected “rated power” at times when high velocities are experienced, to reduce loads on the blades, rotor and generator works and turbine structure. Unlike wind systems, SeaGen’s rotor blades add a patented technology that enables blades to pitch through 180°, allowing for operation during ebb and the flood tides, without having to reposition the entire turbine. Further, the SeaGen rotors operate at varying water depths during the ebb/flow cycle, exposing the blades to cyclic static-pressure variation. To counteract these effects, blade spars are hollow, and during operation, they are filled with seawater to equalize the pressure inside and outside the rotor blade. According to MCT’s patent, at the depths SeaGen operates, filling the void with a lightweight material that is not easily compressible — such as the foamed plastic often used as core material in composite structures — could cause the surface of the rotor-blade to flex under the influence of the cyclic static pressure variations. Over time, the blade skin could suffer from fatigue, with risk of delamination.

Aviation Enterprises Ltd. (AEL, Lambourn Woodlands, Berkshire, U.K.) manufactures SeaGen’s carbon- and glass-fiber/epoxy blade assembly, which includes a fully integrated fiber-optic stress sensing system designed to continuously monitor performance. The 8m/26.2-ft long, 65-mm/2.6-inch thick structural spars are manufactured using VTM260 carbon/epoxy prepreg from Advanced Composites Group Ltd. (Heanor, Derbyshire, U.K.). The composite spar is reportedly bonded to carbon ribs and enveloped in E-glass-reinforced epoxy.

Earlier this year, the SeaGen commercial prototype logged 1,000 hours of operation in Northern Ireland’s Strangford Narrows. At the time, the 1.2-MW tidal current turbine had delivered 800 MW of power into the U.K. national power grid with a reported capacity factor of 66 percent. MCT says the system is capable of delivering nearly 10 megawatt hours (MWh) per tide — 6,000 MWh per year.

Among other projects, MCT plans to deploy a tidal farm off Brough Ness on the southern tip of the Orkney Islands. The project calls for 66 SeaGen tidal turbines, installed in three phases over a four-year period. The first phase of turbines is to be deployed during 2017. MCT hopes to have all 66 turbines operational by 2020 and predicts this array could have a total generating capacity of 99 MW.



All-composite cross-flow turbine

In contrast, the underwater turbine design employed by Ocean Renewable Power Co. (ORPC, Portland, Maine) uses a cross-flow design. The company’s Turbine Generator Unit (TGU) comprises an all-composite cross-flow turbine system and a composite-and-steel support frame, the latter built by U.S. Windblade (Bath, Maine). The turbine incorporates a carbon fiber/E-glass fiber hybrid primary shaft, and disks, rings and helical foils constructed of E-glass-reinforced vinyl ester laminate.

According to Monty Worthington, ORPC’s director of project development in Alaska, who spoke earlier in the year at the Alaska Energy Authority (AEA) Hydrokinetic Technical Conference, the cross-flow turbines spin at 30 to 60 rpm, generating low-rpm/high-torque energy that is converted by a permanent-magnet generator. In tidal applications, there is no need to reposition the turbines, because they will continue to turn in the same direction regardless of the direction of water flow.

The massive frame, which measures 46 ft long, 14 ft wide, and 11 ft tall (14 by 4.3 by 3.4m), was constructed by Stillwater Metalworks (Bangor, Maine) with composite structures supplied by Harbor Technologies (Brunswick, Maine), an experienced marine composites manufacturer, particularly in the glass-reinforced plastic (GFRP) pilings arena. Custom Composites Technologies (Bath, Maine) also was involved in the TGU development.
Earlier this year, ORPC deployed its beta-version TGU in Cobscook Bay off the coast of Eastport, Maine. Suspended from the Energy Tide 2 barge, the 60-kilowatt (kW) device demonstrated its technical feasibility by generating electricity for the Eastport Coast Guard. (An earlier prototype TGU — tested in the Bay of Fundy for a year — was constructed primarily of steel and wood components.)

ORPC plans to have a commercial-scale TGU, given the name TidGen Power System, connected to the electrical grid by the end of the year. By late 2011, this initial 5-MW pilot project is expected to generate “enough electricity to power every home and business in the Eastport area,” says the company. Looking to the future, ORPC hopes to expand the project to supply energy to all of Downeast Maine, and believes tidal energy could be commercially viable by 2015.

Like many tidal-energy developers, ORPC is looking to leverage its experience into other areas of hydrokinetic energy. According to Worthington, the beta TGU is the core of what will be three hydrokinetic power systems: TidGen (bottom mounted in shallow tides), RivGen (bottom-mounted for river applications) and OCGen (floating modules that consist of stacked TGUs for deep tidal and offshore ocean-current applications). The company plans to begin initial commercial installations with gravity-based foundations.



Riding the tides through oscillation

Oscillating turbines, as the term suggests, do not rotate. Instead they rely on the movement of hydrofoils, which are raised and lowered by the tidal stream. In Pulse Tidal’s (Sheffield, U.K.) system, the oscillating hydrofoils lie horizontally in the water and sweep up and down as they change pitch, driving a generator. Advantages here include the fact that the lengths of the horizontal foils are not limited by water depth, allowing the company to install commercial-scale devices (1 MW and larger) in shallow water. This offers easier access for deployment and maintenance and has the potential to limit the length (and therefore expense) of the transmission cable that tethers the turbine to a land-based power grid.

In 2009, Pulse Tidal submerged a 100-kW prototype, called Pulse-Stream 100 (PS100) into the shallow water (9m/29.5 ft deep) at the mouth of the River Humber in the U.K. Electricity generated by the system was exported to Millennium Chemicals, which sits on the south bank of the estuary.

Currently, the Pulse Tidal team is working to install a commercial-scale system close to the shore at Kyle Rhea, the narrow, fast-flowing straits between the Isle of Skye and the Scottish mainland. The initial commercial demonstrator is expected to begin producing 1.2 MW of electricity in 2012. Once proven, the system will be enhanced: Power output can be ramped up to 9.6 MW by stringing eight devices together.

The demonstrator design calls for four composite hydrofoils, or blades, each measuring approximately 20m/65.6 ft in length, connected to a flat base that sits on the seabed. The blades will be engineered and manufactured by Gurit, and will employ the company’s trademarked epoxy SPRINT or prepreg technology, already proven in the manufacture of wind turbine blades and marine craft. Due to the high demands on the structure caused by loads and the operating environment, Gurit’s Royle expects the main load-bearing components to require thick monolithic laminates comparable to those seen on much larger wind turbine blades. Initial blades will contain instrumentation to verify actual loads. The accumulated load data will enable optimization of the system in future iterations.

“The fatigue life and extreme load requirements of the foils dictate that composite materials are the only practical choice,” explains Royle. “An equivalent metallic structure would pay a significant weight penalty, placing very high loads on the rest of the structure with the resultant effect on weight, cost and hydrodynamic drag.”

A number of other companies are developing tidal stream energy concepts — too many to cover here — each applying its own unique spin on the underlying technologies. Minesto AB (Göteborg, Sweden and London, U.K.), for instance, is developing an underwater kite concept known as Deep Green, in which a shrouded horizontal-axis turbine rides under a wing with a rudder that is tethered 100m/328 ft above the sea floor (see photo, at right). Marstrom Composites (Västervik, Sweden) produces the composite components used in the system.  

Regardless of the technology behind the tidal energy device, it is clear that the hydrokinetic energy in tides can be harnessed as a source of electric power. What’s left to be determined is whether or not these systems can be efficient, scalable, and, most importantly, cost-effective, while also offering long-term survivability and reliable operation. Without doubt, material selection will be critical as these companies move forward. Almost certainly, composites in one form or another will emerge as the blade materials of choice. For many developers, the primary challenge now is not materials, but rather getting enough units into the water to reduce costs to a point where tidal energy is competitive in the commercial energy marketplace.

Side Bar

Wave-energy conversion

Click Image to Enlarge

AW-Energy wave-energy converters

Anchored to the seabed, AW-Energy’s (Vantaa, Finland) wave-energy converters will generate electrical energy through the back and forth movement of the systems’ plates as they’re pushed by the water surge. Prototypes of the system use E-glass-reinforced composites. Soruce: AW-Energy

Although wave-energy converters (WECs) lag a few years behind tidal energy systems in terms of commercial viability, there is a lot of action on the development front. More than 40 companies have converters in the prototype and development phases, building on a host of underlying technologies. 

Not all will succeed. A practical WEC, like its tidal-energy cousins, must offer 25-plus years of service in the field but must do so with cost-effective materials. For many, final material selections are yet to be made. But, as with tidal energy, composites could play a decisive role over the next several years as precommercial trials identify the most productive and maintainable systems.

Here’s a select sample of the many unique converter technologies that hydrokinetic power developers are exploiting in WEC systems.

Attenuator technology. Pelamis Wave Power (Edinburgh, U.K.) has developed a semi-submerged, hinged attenuator WEC, consisting of cylindrical sections connected by hinged joints. The wave-induced motion of these joints is resisted by hydraulic rams, which pump high-pressure fluid through hydraulic motors via smoothing accumulators. The motors drive generators, and the resulting electricity is cable-fed to a junction on the seabed. Several devices can be connected together and linked to shore through a single seabed cable. This summer, Pelamis’ P2 machine successfully completed its first set of trials in the outer reaches of the Firth of Forth. The machine, built for power utility E.ON, will be connected to the national grid shortly at the European Marine Energy Centre (EMEC) in Orkeny, Scotland. A second P2 device has been commissioned by Scottish Power Renewables for EMEC testing.

Oscillating water column (OWC) technology can be applied on land, but Ocean Energy Ltd. (Cork, Ireland) is one of several companies exploiting offshore concepts. In an OWC system, water enters a chamber from below the water’s surface and rises up within a shaft, pushing air up through a turbine. As the water recedes, air is pulled back through the turbine to fill the void. In Ireland’s Galway Bay the company’s quarter-scale OWC buoy logged more than 16,000 operating hours during two years in rough Atlantic waves. The next iteration of the device will likely use a HydroAir bi-directional turbine supplied by Dresser-Rand (Houston, Texas). The HydroAir is a variable radius turbine (VRT) developed for OWC applications using a combination of composites, stainless steel and marine-grade aluminum. Ocean Energy is developing a three-quarter-scale version of its device, which will be followed by a full-scale system.

Other OWC developers include Oceanlinx (North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia), which has been testing prototypes in Australia’s Port Kembla. Earlier this year, Oceanlinx launched its third-generation device, a precommercial platform called Mk3PC. The system’s patented Denniss-Auld turbine uses variable pitch blades that enable rotation in one direction as the airflow direction reverses. Mk3PC includes a glass-reinforced composite diffuser and nacelle produced by Radotec (Ingleburn, New South Wales). Connected to the power grid since March, Mk3PC supplies power to customers of local electric utility Integral Energy. Reportedly, a single Oceanlinx power unit can generate peak power outputs from 100 kW to as great as 1.5 MW.

Oscillating wave surge converters (OWSC) are designed to harness energy from near-shore bottom waves. AW-Energy’s (Vantaa, Finland) WaveRoller, for example, takes advantage of the in-and-out surge, or flow velocity, of ocean waves as they approach the shoreline. According to the company, the wave motion becomes more elliptical towards the shoreline and eventually become practically horizontal. (In the Portuguese shoreline, for instance, optimum depth is reportedly 8m/26.2 ft to 20m/65.6 ft.) The WaveRoller exploits this motion by means of a plate anchored to a base on the seabed. As the surge moves the plate, kinetic energy is transferred to the plate and collected by a piston pump. Though construction details are proprietary, the “plate” reportedly consists of GFRP wings in a steel frame on a reinforced concrete base. AW-Energy CEO John Liljelund confirms only that prototypes of the system have used E-glass reinforcement. A 10-kW prototype has operated since 2007. “Currently, we are building a 300-kW grid-connected demonstrator unit that will be deployed on the coast of Portugal during the summer of 2011,” says Liljelund. “Commercial scale devices will be 1.5-MW-plus rated.” The company reports that capacity factor for a WaveRoller plant can reach 65 percent.

Using a similar approach, Aquamarine Power’s (Edinburgh, Scotland) Oyster device incorporates a buoyant, hinged flap that is attached to the seabed at a depth of approximately 10m/32.8 ft. As the flap sways back and forth, the movement drives two hydraulic pistons that push high-pressure water onshore to drive a conventional hydro-electric turbine. A full-scale Oyster was installed at the European Marine Energy Centre (EMEC) in Orkney, Scotland, in summer 2009 and was subsequently connected to the national power grid. The company’s 800-kW Oyster 2 will be installed at the EMEC in 2011. Currently, the Oyster system is manufactured from steel, but, reportedly, the company is hoping to explore the use of other materials, such as composites and engineered wood.

Overtopping devices, such as Wave Dragon’s (Copenhagen, Denmark) self-named device, are essentially floating reservoirs that temporarily collect water in a tapered channel, then release it through hydro turbines that generate electricity. The device is meant to be moored in relatively deep water and is being constructed of a combination of reinforced concrete and steel.    

Point absorbers, designed as either floating or submerged pressure differential systems, are employed by a number of developers, including the following three.

The PowerBuoy, designed by Ocean Power Technologies (OPT, Pennington, N.J.), moves freely up and down as waves rise and fall, resulting in mechanical stroking that is converted via a power take-off to drive an electrical generator. The generated power is transmitted onshore via an underwater cable. According to the company, a 10-MW PowerBuoy power station would occupy approximately 30 acres/0.121 km² of ocean space. In December 2009, the company deployed a PB40 PowerBuoy at the U.S. Marine Corps Base Hawaii (MCBH) at Kaneohe Bay. The U.S. Navy is supporting OPT in its development efforts.

Wavebob, an axi-symmetric, self-reacting point absorber that primarily operates in the heave mode and is designed by Wavebob Ltd. (Kildare, Ireland) to be deployed in large arrays offshore, has been in sea trials since 2006. It first produced electricity from the sea off the west coast of Ireland in 2007. Testing of a precommercial, grid-connected Wavebob is expected to begin off the coast of Portugal at the end of 2011.

In contrast, the AWS-III now under development at AWS Ocean Energy (Inverness, U.K.) is based on Archimedes wave-swing technology, in which seabed-anchored, point-absorbing buoys derive energy from the pressure differential caused within an air-filled cylinder as each wave rises and falls.


Learn More

Editor's Picks

Editor's Picks

Marine Current Installs World's First Megawatt-scale Tidal Turbine

 Marine Current Turbines Ltd. (MCT, Bristol, U.K.) has completed the installation of its 1.2-...

Composite tidal turbine to harness ocean energy

Glass, carbon composites are the materials of choice for system that harvests energy from tidal c...

Wave-energy conversion

Although wave-energy converters (WECs) lag a few years behind tidal energy systems in terms of comme...

Related Suppliers

Gurit UK


Channel Partners